The Editor's Corner -
The cool thing about scienceFrom the way science is often portrayed in popular culture, one could easily get the impression that it’s the most complex and difficult thing in the world. This is ironic really, because whilst some science is highly complex, the underlying concepts are often beautiful in their simplicity. As Einstein said, “everything should be made as simple as possible - but not simpler!” This is the goal of science. Not to generate complexity but instead to create the simplest possible, self consistent and mathematically elegant understanding of the Universe free of any unnecessary clutter. The job of the scientist is to identify the essential logic in a situation, develop a theory based on that logic then test his/her theory against observation - a useful life-skill in itself (see page 10).
Our lead story in this issue is about the changing rate of expansion of the universe. The results that underpin this work were gathered using some of the world’s most sophisticated telescopes, but to illustrate that the universe really is expanding you only need your eyes and a line of reasoning developed by the nineteenth century German astronomer Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers. Olbers argued that if the universe was infinite and filled with an infinite number of stars and if it had been around for ever then which ever way one looked into the sky one would be looking at a star. In this case the whole night sky should be blazing bright not black. The answer to this paradox is that the universe is not static, it’s expanding.
In the nineteenth century, the notion of an expanding universe wasn’t acceptable to conventional wisdom and Olbers concluded that the dark sky was caused by interstellar dust obscuring distant skylight. Although interstellar dust does exist, if there were enough of it to absorb that much light, and the universe were static, the dust would become so hot it would radiate light itself. With no disrespect to Olbers, this illustrates the classic trap of becoming too wedded to one’s expectations to see where the evidence is truly leading you.
My favourite simple demonstration of a profound scientific concept is illustrating the quantum nature of the universe with a prism and a couple of light bulbs. The prism and a cardboard slit are used to make a rudimentary spectrometer. If you use this to examine a normal incandescent light bulb, you should see a continuous rainbow of emission (following the Stefan–Boltzmann black body radiation law.)
But a fluorescent light (such as one of the new low energy lamps) emits only in narrow lines of certain colours. The explanation is that atoms in the excited gas within the fluorescent light only emit energy at set wavelengths. This in turn is because the orbitals of their electrons are only allowed to occupy certain quantum states. If there was no quantum physics the electrons would slowly wind down towards the nucleus radiating multiwavelength electromagnetic waves as any moving charge on the macroscopic scale does.
This is the cool thing about science, you don’t have to just accept what you’re told. You can test many of its theories for your self using the simplest of equipment, and logical reasoning. All you have to do is keep asking why? And be sure to follow your observations rather than your expectations.
Dr Tim Wetherell - ScienceWise Editor